Post by messi05 on Jan 24, 2024 7:18:29 GMT
Public health action (Decree 7,508, of 2011) that legal certainty is guaranteed for agreements resulting from inter-management committees. It is necessary to consider the organization and functioning of the SUS and review the concept of joint liability established by the STF. It may impose obligations on the municipality [6] that are incompatible with its demographic size, socioeconomic conditions, geographic and epidemiological situation, deepening federal inequalities.
A decision, like the one analyzed here, places Buy Phone Number List the SUS in a situation of financial and organizational danger and therefore it is urgent to review the concept expressed by the higher courts of joint responsibility due to the fact that the nature of the SUS is one of sharing, cooperation, network, interdependence, It is incompatible to condemn an entity like the municipality of Capim Branco to solely guaranteeing the right to health. To date, the allocation of resources from the Ministry of Health [7] to states and municipalities does not comply with the criteria of article 17 of Complementary Law 141, of 2012.
What has occurred are transfers in the form of incentives for adhesion of subnational entities to federal programs, with specifications, such as that high-cost services must be financed by the Union and executed by the state, or by large municipalities of regional reference. Such an insufficient federative apportionment model must have led the TRF-1 to adopt the concept of Union responsibility for high-cost services, when the system should, in reality, be co-financed by the Union in relation to states and municipalities and by the state in relation to to their municipalities. The correct thing is for the Ministry of Health to transfer resources to the states and municipalities in accordance with the criteria defined in the form of LC 141, to be applied according to the health planning of the federative entities.
A decision, like the one analyzed here, places Buy Phone Number List the SUS in a situation of financial and organizational danger and therefore it is urgent to review the concept expressed by the higher courts of joint responsibility due to the fact that the nature of the SUS is one of sharing, cooperation, network, interdependence, It is incompatible to condemn an entity like the municipality of Capim Branco to solely guaranteeing the right to health. To date, the allocation of resources from the Ministry of Health [7] to states and municipalities does not comply with the criteria of article 17 of Complementary Law 141, of 2012.
What has occurred are transfers in the form of incentives for adhesion of subnational entities to federal programs, with specifications, such as that high-cost services must be financed by the Union and executed by the state, or by large municipalities of regional reference. Such an insufficient federative apportionment model must have led the TRF-1 to adopt the concept of Union responsibility for high-cost services, when the system should, in reality, be co-financed by the Union in relation to states and municipalities and by the state in relation to to their municipalities. The correct thing is for the Ministry of Health to transfer resources to the states and municipalities in accordance with the criteria defined in the form of LC 141, to be applied according to the health planning of the federative entities.